On Thursday night I headed over to the Apple Valley City Council meeting to listen to the nearly unending barrage of the usual. Everything from the Apple Valley Mid-Winter Fest (2/7 and 2/8) to the approval of various consent agenda items. Honestly, nothing in there is much worth going through even though I’ll probably reserve it for some bathroom reading material over the next few days. What is important to note, however, is that the Apple Valley City Council proves once again, just through their drink selection at a City Council meetings, that they haven’t the slightest fucking clue what “being green” means and they may be trying to tell us, at least through their actions, that they don’t feel city water is safe to drink.
You might ask, huh? How could someone’s choice of drink, aside from Saint Patrick’s Day, be able to change someone’s “green” labeling? Well, you might be surprised to find out that our ever-so-environmentally-conscience mayor apparently supports the distribution and drinking of bottled water during Apple Valley City Council Meetings. I don’t know about you, but drinking water from plastic bottles is just about the dumbest fucking thing to ever happen to our planet and should not be done under nearly any circumstance (unless of course there are safety issues, which wasn’t the case at least as of 6/2008 [PDF warning]).
Here are some reasons why our ever-so-”green” city council must stop using bottled water during any and all sessions (public or not) unless an emergency exists that would limit the consumption of Apple Valley’s own water supply:
1. Bottled water is a drain on natural resources, especially fossil fuels.
Bottled water is held in plastic containers which can be recycled but require fossil fuels for the transportation to the store, to Apple Valley’s Municipal Center, and then to the recycling center after they are spent. This is an unacceptable waste on all fronts and needs to be eliminated if the city council wants to stop being a bunch of fucking hypocrites.
2. Bottled water is expensive.
I’m absolutely fucking thrilled that as a taxpayer I am funding the Apple Valley City Council (and staff)’s desire to drink overpriced tap water. Tap water = near free. Bottled water is no where even close, especially when it’s Aquafina 20 oz bottles we’re talking about here. Remember all that talk about being fiscally responsible and how you not only gave yourselves raises but raised taxes more than anyone else in the South Metro because you refused to cut anything from the budget? Well, the first thing you should have cut was the added expense of drinking water from plastic bottles, don’t you think?
If other municipalities around the country can ban bottled water so can Apple Valley. Please note that Burnsville’s City Council normally drinks tap water, from pitchers, in washable glasses. At their last special worksession they made note that they were drinking bottled water but they normally do not.
Just so you all know, I drink tap water or filtered tap water all the time. I don’t buy bottled water and I think that anyone who does is a fucking sucker. If you think you’re safer because you’re drinking bottled water, you’re wrong.
3. Many bottled water varieties comes directly from tap water.
If Apple Valley’s water is safe, as evidenced by the flier sent out last June, then the Apple Valley City Council should be proving that they too agree with this fact and drink it. They’re drinking what’s basically filtered tap water from some other town, why not drink tap water chlorinated right here in the city limits? Even the FDA, going back several years, says that there’s no real difference between tap and bottled water.
So Apple Valley City Council, at the next city council meeting you need to do three things:
1. Publicly apologize for wasting taxpayer dollars on the unnecessary purchase of Aquafina bottled water to quench your thirst. I’m still waiting, with bated breath, for your apology for your other wasteful spending habits but as of yet, have not seen any action, writing, or speech which denounces your poor choices.
2. Switch to drinking Apple Valley tap water from glasses that can be washed and reused later. During one of your public service announcements, have someone tell the citizens of Apple Valley that drinking bottled water is not only bad for the environment but is financially irresponsible. No one gives a shit about the 18 “potentially dangerous dogs” or the fact that you feel that you’re doing a great job clearing the roads but they should care that their drinking water is safe enough to drink and not waste their hard earned dollars drinking in the corporate Kool-Aid scam that is bottled water.
3. Stop fucking telling everyone you’re green when it’s obvious that you don’t have any clue what that means. Just because you waste money on “geo-thermal” HVAC systems and “living roofs” doesn’t mean that you can offset those “gains” with your stupid choices for much smaller things — like the decision to drink bottled water.
So I ask you, the readers, do you think that Apple Valley has made a poor choice in promoting its “green” campaign by choosing to ignore something as simple drinking city tap water? Perhaps you’re a bottled water drinker — can you explain why you chose to waste your time and money on something that’s no different than what comes out of your own tap?
Whatever comes to your mind on this topic, comment on as I’m genuinely interested in what you have to say!
Related posts:
Dakota Inmate Dashboard







January 22nd, 2009 at 11:56 pm
Here is what I think. While do understand your argument and even believe most of your statements to be true. I think that such concentration on a minor expense distracts from the core issue. That being we are going broke living here.
I picture the city council talking about that crazy guy with the bottle water fetish. When in fact most of your postings are very valid.
Here’s a more substantial one that comes to mind. Did I really buy a “living roof”? That sounds like a fortune and I want my money back.
Also like to point out that the city should only be concerned with one “green”, that being money. Al Gore “green” shit should save money or don’t do it. Tap water = green (cheaper). makes sense. Living roof = expensive with no scientific proof as to it’s benefits. In fact it may be anti-environment due to the gas consumed growing, potting and relocating the plants to the roof…it’s a complicated world.
Thanks for continuing to keep me up to date on my crack ass city.
January 23rd, 2009 at 8:13 am
Bottled water is portable and has it’s place – just maybe not at a city council meeting. Regardless, how do you know the council members didn’t take their bottled water home, refill them with their own tap water and reuse the bottles before recycling them?
January 23rd, 2009 at 9:22 am
I drink Dasani or Deja Blue water when possible because they taste better.
But I don’t go around proclaiming myself “green”, nor do I think it appropriate to expect others to foot the bill for my beverages of choice.
January 23rd, 2009 at 11:19 am
Collecting, cleaning, sanitizing, and redistributing cups is not so “green”. Why offer beverages in the first place?
January 23rd, 2009 at 11:44 am
Water is typically offered at just about any meeting, fehler. Though in every meeting I’ve ever been to, it’s always been a pitcher full of water and ice.
I drink water at home filtered through a Brita pitcher. I’ll buy a bottle of water if I’m out and about and I get thirsty, but at work I drink out of a Nalgene bottle, at home we Brita filter our drinking water. Bottled water has it’s place, in my opinion, if I’m out shopping, I’d rather grab a bottled water than a bottled soda.
It may be a minor expense, but there’s no reason they need to drink bottled water at the city council meetings. Is there water available to those attending the meeting not on the board? They should have a water station available to everyone. Bill,I think next time you should walk up to the desk and ask for a bottle of water.
I do think in this instance paper cups are probably the way to go, because the expense of hiring staff to wash the re-usable glasses is probably a higher cost.
January 23rd, 2009 at 11:50 am
1. They offer coffee, with paper cups, outside for the public. Last night I used the water fountain available near the elevator for my drinking prior to the meeting.
2. Paper still adds to recycling or landfill problems. Not a good way to go IMO. If they already have someone prepping the coffee urns and distributing the bottles, it wouldn’t be that much more of a stretch to use washable glasses and pitchers.
January 23rd, 2009 at 1:02 pm
I hope that’s organic, fair-trade coffee.
January 23rd, 2009 at 1:04 pm
That’s about as fiscally responsible as the piece of mail I got stating that my city utility payment was overdue. First off, the due date was MLK day when there is no mail service and city hall (the only payment drop box) is locked up. Secondly, the charge was 65 cents. Half of that was spent on postage trying to collect it.
January 23rd, 2009 at 5:28 pm
I usually don’t agree with you (sorry), but in this case I agree with you 100%. I’ve lived in other countries where it is necessary to drink bottled water (or to boil your water before drinking it), but I think it is SO wasteful (and not green) to drink bottled water in Apple Valley. I usually don’t think that AV should follow in Burnsville’s footsteps, but on this issue they should. Ridiculous.
January 23rd, 2009 at 9:12 pm
Bill, if there’s no water available to the attendees, I definitely think you should ask for a bottle :)
January 24th, 2009 at 9:05 am
how ’bout a jug filled from the water fountain and some glasses? but someone would have to wash the glasses! bummer!
bb