<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thisweek Ignores Creative Commons Licensing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing</link>
	<description>http://www.lazylightning.org - The South Metro News Source!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:13:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pardon My French Uses Photo Without Permission &#124; Bill Roehl</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-39934</link>
		<dc:creator>Pardon My French Uses Photo Without Permission &#124; Bill Roehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-39934</guid>
		<description>[...] it did. A for-profit business used one of my photos without my permission and without attribution. Last time it was a local newspaper, this time it&#8217;s a local restaurant&#8211;and one that I wasn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it did. A for-profit business used one of my photos without my permission and without attribution. Last time it was a local newspaper, this time it&#8217;s a local restaurant&#8211;and one that I wasn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-32473</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-32473</guid>
		<description>It took one invoice and two followup statements as well as an e-mail to ECM Publishers, Inc.&#039;s CEO to get the job done. I&#039;m glad that I didn&#039;t waste anymore of my own time or someone else&#039;s time to get what was due me. 

It was nearly two months since the saga started but I&#039;m glad to be able to link to their content again and stop wondering if they were going to do the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took one invoice and two followup statements as well as an e-mail to ECM Publishers, Inc.&#8217;s CEO to get the job done. I&#8217;m glad that I didn&#8217;t waste anymore of my own time or someone else&#8217;s time to get what was due me. </p>
<p>It was nearly two months since the saga started but I&#8217;m glad to be able to link to their content again and stop wondering if they were going to do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-32470</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-32470</guid>
		<description>Not sure why they dicked around with this for so long, but I&#039;m glad that someone over there was smart enough to settle this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why they dicked around with this for so long, but I&#8217;m glad that someone over there was smart enough to settle this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought Leader</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-32383</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought Leader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 01:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-32383</guid>
		<description>About time Thisweek.....  I am glad to see that Thisweek finally got around to doing the right thing.  Now I may actually read the paper before removing it from the black box and tossing it in the trash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About time Thisweek&#8230;..  I am glad to see that Thisweek finally got around to doing the right thing.  Now I may actually read the paper before removing it from the black box and tossing it in the trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whit o' wit</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-32381</link>
		<dc:creator>Whit o' wit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-32381</guid>
		<description>wa-HOOOO! Good for you, Bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wa-HOOOO! Good for you, Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-32372</link>
		<dc:creator>BK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-32372</guid>
		<description>Bill, glad to see your diligence paid off and that you got paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, glad to see your diligence paid off and that you got paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thisweek Doesn&#8217;t Take Stolen Photo Invoice Seriously &#124; Bill Roehl</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-32371</link>
		<dc:creator>Thisweek Doesn&#8217;t Take Stolen Photo Invoice Seriously &#124; Bill Roehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-32371</guid>
		<description>[...] This issue has been resolved to my satisfaction and is now closed (see here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This issue has been resolved to my satisfaction and is now closed (see here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-32369</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-32369</guid>
		<description>Thisweek has paid the invoice in full, including late fees, and I now consider the matter closed. This thread will remain open until Tuesday morning for comments (since the majority of people here don&#039;t read until Monday anyway) and then I will close this thread to future commenting.

Please note that the article above now has a disclaimer that the issue is closed. Thanks for all of your support everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thisweek has paid the invoice in full, including late fees, and I now consider the matter closed. This thread will remain open until Tuesday morning for comments (since the majority of people here don&#8217;t read until Monday anyway) and then I will close this thread to future commenting.</p>
<p>Please note that the article above now has a disclaimer that the issue is closed. Thanks for all of your support everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought Leader</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-30259</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought Leader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-30259</guid>
		<description>Well, this is how I see the invoicing process carried out in the private sector. In the event that an invoice is not paid in full, a dispute with the invoice should be raised, documented and delvered to the individual or company sending the invoice and the monies for the shotfall in payment should be placed in escrow until the dispute is resolved.  In the event that the dispute can not be reconciled between the parties an agreed upon mediator can be leveraged or a claim filed in a local court would ensue.  If the dispute is settled in favor of the invoicer, late payment penalties, interest, and costs to reconcile the dispute may be considered and assessed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is how I see the invoicing process carried out in the private sector. In the event that an invoice is not paid in full, a dispute with the invoice should be raised, documented and delvered to the individual or company sending the invoice and the monies for the shotfall in payment should be placed in escrow until the dispute is resolved.  In the event that the dispute can not be reconciled between the parties an agreed upon mediator can be leveraged or a claim filed in a local court would ensue.  If the dispute is settled in favor of the invoicer, late payment penalties, interest, and costs to reconcile the dispute may be considered and assessed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://www.lazylightning.org/thisweek-ignores-creative-commons-licensing#comment-30254</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazylightning.org/?p=3573#comment-30254</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do companies routinely pay 1/6th of an invoice and call it good? I doubt it.&quot;

Only if 1/6 of the material or service has been delivered/performed.  Best of luck collecting the remainder buddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do companies routinely pay 1/6th of an invoice and call it good? I doubt it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Only if 1/6 of the material or service has been delivered/performed.  Best of luck collecting the remainder buddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
