
Back in 2010 Lazy Lightning interviewed Ryan Moe during his failed bid for Mayor of Apple Valley. It was during that time that the public was treated to Mr. Moe’s general dislike of government interference in the personal lives of individuals and small business. He was also interviewed by the Libertarian Party of Minnesota during his campaign and shared even more of his thoughts on how local government should operate:
Mr. Moe would also seek to ban the city from using Google Earth or satellite imagery to snoop onto homeowners’ property, looking for swimming pools, decks, or sheds. Furthermore, he’d like to end the permitting requirement for home renovations. A permit is now required even for replacement of a home water heater. He disagrees with home improvements being used by the city as a way to extract more revenue with permit fees and property tax reassessments, and getting to the root of the issue, he believes homeowners should not have to go to beg government bureaucrats for permission to improve their own private property. If homeowners want to improve their homes, this should be commended, not penalized.
According to the meeting agenda background information for the October 11, 2012 Apple Valley City Council Meeting, where nearly 600 Apple Valley property owners were listed as being delinquent on their utilities averaging $237/each, both of Mr. Moe’s properties appeared on the list.
Mr. Moe owns two properties, both of which are delinquent and his properties owe a combined total of $496.88 to the city. While it may be commendable to fight against undue taxation and excess government spending, not paying utilities and negatively impacting the rest of the community does not exactly fit into the Libertarian ethos. While Lazy Lightning is singling out Mr. Moe due to his prior run for public office and his Libertarian views, it’s likely that many of those on this list are just as guilty of the same offenses.
Do you agree that your utilities should be your first concern for payment after your mortgage and taxes (which they will eventually be added to as part of the process for those who do not clear their debt)? Do you find it against the Libertarian mantra to negatively impact your fellow citizens through non-payment of services? Should cities do more public notices of these delinquencies in an attempt to publicly shame those who do not pay to clear their debts? Whatever you have to say about this one go ahead and comment on as I’d love to hear your thoughts.
Dakota Inmate Dashboard







October 11th, 2012 at 8:42 pm
Should they come first, sure. But many people choose lots of stuff over those things they should be spending money on. Cigarettes are probably the biggest thing I see people who can’t afford it spend money on. After that it’s cable tv, internet, cell phones. Things that used to be extras, but now folks either feel or find are required.
October 12th, 2012 at 7:20 am
Without knowing why the bills aren’t being paid, it’s difficult to know if he’s acting consistently with his beliefs or not, though I agree that it looks bad. He’d hardly be the first person with libertarian views who owed the government money, though.
For purely practical reasons, I’d put utilities first even ahead of a mortgage, because having them shut off would make things pretty difficult.
October 12th, 2012 at 10:05 am
The city doesn’t shut them off generally. They attach the cost as a rider on your property taxes. Renters get stuff shut off. Property owners end up paying for it eventually along with some extra fees for various admin costs.